Zoning Bylaw Rewrite

Share Zoning Bylaw Rewrite on Facebook Share Zoning Bylaw Rewrite on Twitter Share Zoning Bylaw Rewrite on Linkedin Email Zoning Bylaw Rewrite link

We're rewriting our Zoning Bylaw (ZB) to make it clearer and easier to use, streamline regulations, support and encourage economic growth, align with current policy documents (including the new Official Community Plan [OCP]), and better reflect community needs to support growth and development.

You can stay informed by subscribing to the project.


What is a Zoning Bylaw?

A Zoning Bylaw is a document required by the Yukon Municipal Act (the Act) that sets out regulations for land uses and development within a municipality.


The purpose of the City’s Zoning Bylaw is to:

We're rewriting our Zoning Bylaw (ZB) to make it clearer and easier to use, streamline regulations, support and encourage economic growth, align with current policy documents (including the new Official Community Plan [OCP]), and better reflect community needs to support growth and development.

You can stay informed by subscribing to the project.


What is a Zoning Bylaw?

A Zoning Bylaw is a document required by the Yukon Municipal Act (the Act) that sets out regulations for land uses and development within a municipality.


The purpose of the City’s Zoning Bylaw is to:

  • Implement the policy direction provided in the City’s new OCP and other Council-approved plans and policies.
  • Organize the municipality into zones (ex. residential, commercial, industrial, etc.) and set out permitted uses for each zone.
  • Set standards for the height, appearance, size, and location of buildings.
  • Determine parking, signage, and landscaping design standards.
  • Guide the permit and rezoning process.


Why is a new Zoning Bylaw needed?

The current Zoning Bylaw was adopted in 2012, and although it has been updated periodically throughout its life, a new bylaw is required to help implement the new OCP and reflect changing community values since the 2012 bylaw was adopted. The Zoning Bylaw is being rewritten to make it clearer and easier to use, streamline regulations, support and encourage economic growth, align with the new OCP, and better reflect community needs to support growth and development.


How does the Zoning Bylaw rewrite impact me?

Zoning regulations shape our neighbourhoods. They regulate building heights, setbacks and the types of development allowed on a property, in a specific neighbourhood or zone. If you are planning to develop or change your existing property or its use after the new Zoning Bylaw has been approved, the new regulations will apply. If you are not planning to develop or alter your existing property, what currently exists on your property will not need to be altered to meet new regulations, provided it was allowed in the first place (ex. Your current shed may not meet the new regulations, but that’s ok, it can stay as-is. However, if you decide to alter it or build a new one, you will need to ensure it meets the new regulations).


What is the relationship between the OCP and Zoning Bylaw?

The Whitehorse 2040 Official Community Plan (OCP) guides the City as it grows over the coming decades. The plan establishes our objectives for growth and development. The Act mandates that the Zoning Bylaw needs to be updated within two years of adoption of the new OCP. The Zoning Bylaw uses the OCP planning framework to guide development.

Zoning Questions Corner

We're here to answer your questions! We understand that navigating through zoning regulations can be a complex task, and we are committed to providing clarity and transparency in our efforts to rewrite and improve the Zoning Bylaw. 

Have questions about the proposed housing amendments? Questions about the overall rewrite process? Ask them here, and a member of our team will provide a response. 

Please note: If you have input that you would like Council to consider as part of the public hearing for the proposed housing amendments on March 25, 2024, you must send written input to publicinput@whitehorse.ca or appear in person at the public hearing. City staff will respond to questions submitted on this page, but these will not be submitted to Council as part of the public hearing for the bylaw process.

loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share Can you tell me where I can learn more about the proposed change where Riverdale properties would be able to accommodate 4 homes? I find this concerning and would like to learn more. on Facebook Share Can you tell me where I can learn more about the proposed change where Riverdale properties would be able to accommodate 4 homes? I find this concerning and would like to learn more. on Twitter Share Can you tell me where I can learn more about the proposed change where Riverdale properties would be able to accommodate 4 homes? I find this concerning and would like to learn more. on Linkedin Email Can you tell me where I can learn more about the proposed change where Riverdale properties would be able to accommodate 4 homes? I find this concerning and would like to learn more. link

    Can you tell me where I can learn more about the proposed change where Riverdale properties would be able to accommodate 4 homes? I find this concerning and would like to learn more.

    JD asked 14 days ago

    Thanks for your question. The new regulations apply to all urban ‘single detached’ residential zones, including the RS zone which covers most of Riverdale. You can review our map of affected zones here

    All developments must comply with the development regulations of the Zoning Bylaw with setbacks*, site coverage*, building height, parking*, and landscaping requirements the being same or similar to what’s allowed for a single detached house in the same zone. These regulations are in place to ensure that new development respects existing patterns of site design and building form, and fits in with the surrounding neighbourhood. (Items with an asterisk (*) may have modest relaxations to these development regulations where additional units are provided). You can read more about the new regulations in our Housing-related Zoning Amendments – Guide to New Regulations document.

  • Share What are the expected impacts on utility infrastructure (water, sewer, electrical) with the increase in density? Will individual property owners be responsible for required upgrades to shared infrastructure? on Facebook Share What are the expected impacts on utility infrastructure (water, sewer, electrical) with the increase in density? Will individual property owners be responsible for required upgrades to shared infrastructure? on Twitter Share What are the expected impacts on utility infrastructure (water, sewer, electrical) with the increase in density? Will individual property owners be responsible for required upgrades to shared infrastructure? on Linkedin Email What are the expected impacts on utility infrastructure (water, sewer, electrical) with the increase in density? Will individual property owners be responsible for required upgrades to shared infrastructure? link

    What are the expected impacts on utility infrastructure (water, sewer, electrical) with the increase in density? Will individual property owners be responsible for required upgrades to shared infrastructure?

    Ron asked about 2 months ago

    Hi Ron, thanks for your question. New developments will be required to demonstrate that servicing adequately supports the proposed additional development on a site. This includes water supply for domestic use, water supply for fire protection, sanitary servicing, and electrical servicing.  Where existing services are inadequate, the developer will be required to either: 

    • Amend their design to reduce the service demand; 
    • Upsize existing servicing at their cost; or 
    • Wait for infrastructure upgrades to be carried out based on the City’s schedule for capital projects (or ATCO, in the case of electrical servicing)  

    The proposed Zoning changes are likely to incrementally increase demand on the City’s existing utility infrastructure. Over the coming years, the City will continue to assess the current and planned capacity of utility services and may need to adjust its approach to infrastructure life-cycle management, depending on the actual rate of uptake under these changes.

    The City is currently preparing to launch a new project to create a Development Funding Strategy which, once completed, will help to inform how the City funds new infrastructure and infrastructure replacements, with a goal to ensure that infrastructure costs are distributed equitably between existing and future residents. This strategy is expected to be completed by Spring 2025.

  • Share Why is the plan to change zoning bylaws? There is so much land in and around whitehorse. Instead of packing more places tightly onto the lots that are already here, wouldn't it make more sense to allow people to build and develop crown land and empty land? Why is an empty lot so expensive? Why keep making building codes so ridiculous that it makes building a home so expensive? When it's so complex and so many requirements to build it makes housing unaffordable. Same with restrictions to where people can build. Better to have squatters on public land building shelters than homeless people. on Facebook Share Why is the plan to change zoning bylaws? There is so much land in and around whitehorse. Instead of packing more places tightly onto the lots that are already here, wouldn't it make more sense to allow people to build and develop crown land and empty land? Why is an empty lot so expensive? Why keep making building codes so ridiculous that it makes building a home so expensive? When it's so complex and so many requirements to build it makes housing unaffordable. Same with restrictions to where people can build. Better to have squatters on public land building shelters than homeless people. on Twitter Share Why is the plan to change zoning bylaws? There is so much land in and around whitehorse. Instead of packing more places tightly onto the lots that are already here, wouldn't it make more sense to allow people to build and develop crown land and empty land? Why is an empty lot so expensive? Why keep making building codes so ridiculous that it makes building a home so expensive? When it's so complex and so many requirements to build it makes housing unaffordable. Same with restrictions to where people can build. Better to have squatters on public land building shelters than homeless people. on Linkedin Email Why is the plan to change zoning bylaws? There is so much land in and around whitehorse. Instead of packing more places tightly onto the lots that are already here, wouldn't it make more sense to allow people to build and develop crown land and empty land? Why is an empty lot so expensive? Why keep making building codes so ridiculous that it makes building a home so expensive? When it's so complex and so many requirements to build it makes housing unaffordable. Same with restrictions to where people can build. Better to have squatters on public land building shelters than homeless people. link

    Why is the plan to change zoning bylaws? There is so much land in and around whitehorse. Instead of packing more places tightly onto the lots that are already here, wouldn't it make more sense to allow people to build and develop crown land and empty land? Why is an empty lot so expensive? Why keep making building codes so ridiculous that it makes building a home so expensive? When it's so complex and so many requirements to build it makes housing unaffordable. Same with restrictions to where people can build. Better to have squatters on public land building shelters than homeless people.

    Harold asked about 2 months ago

    Hi Harold, great questions! The Whitehorse 2040 Official Community Plan (OCP) provides a 20-Year Residential Growth Strategy (see page 49) which includes a mix of greenfield development as well as residential intensification and redevelopment. These proposed zoning changes are not happening instead of greenfield development, but in addition to it, in an effort to encourage the construction of a range of housing types throughout the City. These changes will help to achieve more cost-efficient use of existing infrastructure and reduce the per-dwelling cost of new infrastructure.

    Greenfield development is expensive because all of the inputs (materials, labour, and energy) required to design and build new subdivisions are a lot more expensive than they used to be. In addition, easy-to-build-on land has been largely used up, with remaining land presenting additional challenges such as shallow bedrock, or being on the other side of the river, which increases development costs. The OCP has identified two new growth areas to accommodate long-term growth: the South and North Growth Areas (as shown on maps 3 and 5 of the OCP). Planning for the South Growth Area is now progressing in the early stages. Due to the high cost of greenfield development, it will be important to ensure that these areas are developed efficiently, to reduce per-dwelling costs and extend how long these growth areas will be able to accommodate the City’s population growth. 

    With regard to your question about the building code: the City uses the National Building Code, as adopted by the Government of Yukon, to ensure a minimum standard of safety, comfort, and energy efficiency for buildings in Whitehorse. The City believes these standards are fair and reasonable, and create a level playing field for building construction throughout Canada.  

  • Share Are you publishing all questions? I see below you have publicized someone's address. on Facebook Share Are you publishing all questions? I see below you have publicized someone's address. on Twitter Share Are you publishing all questions? I see below you have publicized someone's address. on Linkedin Email Are you publishing all questions? I see below you have publicized someone's address. link

    Are you publishing all questions? I see below you have publicized someone's address.

    yukonnaise.anglais asked about 2 months ago

    Questions that are submitted directly on this platform will be published, unless they are offensive, contain sensitive information, or are completely unrelated to the topic. We don’t have the ability to edit questions that have been submitted by members of the public, so our only options are to publish it, or not publish it (and either answer privately, or ignore it). In this case, the project team determined that the question was one that was important to answer publicly, and that the presence of a municipal address, provided voluntarily by the asker, was not sensitive enough to withhold the question.

    The City also receives relevant questions through other channels such as social media, or sent directly by email. In these cases, the questions are uploaded to this EngageWhitehorse platform by City staff, with a note disclosing that they were received through a different channel. Prior to uploading, these questions may be edited if needed to remove any identifying information, such as names or addresses.

  • Share With the increasing number of motor vehicles per household, it would be reasonable to expect a 4-plex to have at least 4, but more likely 8 or more vehicles associated with it. Will the developers be required to provide on-site parking or will the street absorb the increased parking demand? on Facebook Share With the increasing number of motor vehicles per household, it would be reasonable to expect a 4-plex to have at least 4, but more likely 8 or more vehicles associated with it. Will the developers be required to provide on-site parking or will the street absorb the increased parking demand? on Twitter Share With the increasing number of motor vehicles per household, it would be reasonable to expect a 4-plex to have at least 4, but more likely 8 or more vehicles associated with it. Will the developers be required to provide on-site parking or will the street absorb the increased parking demand? on Linkedin Email With the increasing number of motor vehicles per household, it would be reasonable to expect a 4-plex to have at least 4, but more likely 8 or more vehicles associated with it. Will the developers be required to provide on-site parking or will the street absorb the increased parking demand? link

    With the increasing number of motor vehicles per household, it would be reasonable to expect a 4-plex to have at least 4, but more likely 8 or more vehicles associated with it. Will the developers be required to provide on-site parking or will the street absorb the increased parking demand?

    Paul asked about 2 months ago

    A 4-unit development in a residential zone outside of downtown would be required to provide 4 parking spaces on the property, unless two of the units are living or garden suites, in which case the development would require 3 parking spaces. Parking spaces are required to be provided in accordance with the site design and parking regulations of the Zoning Bylaw – there are regulations around location and size of parking spaces and maximum driveway width to ensure good site design. As is currently the case, households with more vehicles than parking spaces may use on-street parking in accordance with the Traffic Bylaw and any parking signage erected by the City. The City will monitor demand for on-street parking and, if warranted, may deploy tools such as parking permits or other approaches to manage on-street parking.

  • Share *This question was originally received by the planning team via email. With respect to the proposed zoning changes, how will the City address the increased parking demand? In Riverdale, most if not all of the older apartments, all have at the very least, two vehicles per unit. When the apartments were built, they provided one parking stall per unit on site. At present, the parking demand has far exceeded the available parking on the streets where the apartments are located, and has spread to adjacent streets. With the increasing number of legal (and illegal) suites as well as granny type suites, the demand for parking has also increased, with no conditions made for additional on site parking provided by the owner. These conditions, combined with the general increase in the number of motor vehicles per household has created an issue where our streets are becoming parking lots. With further densification being considered, will the City put in place a comprehensive parking policy first, or will densification occur and parking will somehow have to sort itself out? In the City of Whitehorse bylaws, the City requires on street parking permits, yet this bylaw has never been applied nor enforced. Increasing density is a responsible measure, but parking is an essential component that must be addressed first. on Facebook Share *This question was originally received by the planning team via email. With respect to the proposed zoning changes, how will the City address the increased parking demand? In Riverdale, most if not all of the older apartments, all have at the very least, two vehicles per unit. When the apartments were built, they provided one parking stall per unit on site. At present, the parking demand has far exceeded the available parking on the streets where the apartments are located, and has spread to adjacent streets. With the increasing number of legal (and illegal) suites as well as granny type suites, the demand for parking has also increased, with no conditions made for additional on site parking provided by the owner. These conditions, combined with the general increase in the number of motor vehicles per household has created an issue where our streets are becoming parking lots. With further densification being considered, will the City put in place a comprehensive parking policy first, or will densification occur and parking will somehow have to sort itself out? In the City of Whitehorse bylaws, the City requires on street parking permits, yet this bylaw has never been applied nor enforced. Increasing density is a responsible measure, but parking is an essential component that must be addressed first. on Twitter Share *This question was originally received by the planning team via email. With respect to the proposed zoning changes, how will the City address the increased parking demand? In Riverdale, most if not all of the older apartments, all have at the very least, two vehicles per unit. When the apartments were built, they provided one parking stall per unit on site. At present, the parking demand has far exceeded the available parking on the streets where the apartments are located, and has spread to adjacent streets. With the increasing number of legal (and illegal) suites as well as granny type suites, the demand for parking has also increased, with no conditions made for additional on site parking provided by the owner. These conditions, combined with the general increase in the number of motor vehicles per household has created an issue where our streets are becoming parking lots. With further densification being considered, will the City put in place a comprehensive parking policy first, or will densification occur and parking will somehow have to sort itself out? In the City of Whitehorse bylaws, the City requires on street parking permits, yet this bylaw has never been applied nor enforced. Increasing density is a responsible measure, but parking is an essential component that must be addressed first. on Linkedin Email *This question was originally received by the planning team via email. With respect to the proposed zoning changes, how will the City address the increased parking demand? In Riverdale, most if not all of the older apartments, all have at the very least, two vehicles per unit. When the apartments were built, they provided one parking stall per unit on site. At present, the parking demand has far exceeded the available parking on the streets where the apartments are located, and has spread to adjacent streets. With the increasing number of legal (and illegal) suites as well as granny type suites, the demand for parking has also increased, with no conditions made for additional on site parking provided by the owner. These conditions, combined with the general increase in the number of motor vehicles per household has created an issue where our streets are becoming parking lots. With further densification being considered, will the City put in place a comprehensive parking policy first, or will densification occur and parking will somehow have to sort itself out? In the City of Whitehorse bylaws, the City requires on street parking permits, yet this bylaw has never been applied nor enforced. Increasing density is a responsible measure, but parking is an essential component that must be addressed first. link

    *This question was originally received by the planning team via email. With respect to the proposed zoning changes, how will the City address the increased parking demand? In Riverdale, most if not all of the older apartments, all have at the very least, two vehicles per unit. When the apartments were built, they provided one parking stall per unit on site. At present, the parking demand has far exceeded the available parking on the streets where the apartments are located, and has spread to adjacent streets. With the increasing number of legal (and illegal) suites as well as granny type suites, the demand for parking has also increased, with no conditions made for additional on site parking provided by the owner. These conditions, combined with the general increase in the number of motor vehicles per household has created an issue where our streets are becoming parking lots. With further densification being considered, will the City put in place a comprehensive parking policy first, or will densification occur and parking will somehow have to sort itself out? In the City of Whitehorse bylaws, the City requires on street parking permits, yet this bylaw has never been applied nor enforced. Increasing density is a responsible measure, but parking is an essential component that must be addressed first.

    City Resident asked about 2 months ago

    Thanks for your question. Off-street parking (i.e. on private property) is currently required to be provided for all new developments at a rate of one space per dwelling unit throughout most of the City, except downtown where it is one space per two dwelling units. Under the proposed changes, most developments providing new residential dwellings will still be required to provide one space per unit, except where two living or garden suites are provided, in which case a parking space would not be required for the second suite. 

    There are no proposed changes to the parking requirement for multiple housing in residential zones. Under the proposed changes, multiple housing in commercial zones (mostly downtown, and in urban centres in some neighbourhoods) would no longer be required to provide visitor parking spaces, but would still be required to provide resident parking at the current rate.

     On-street parking is regulated by the City’s Traffic Bylaw. The City will monitor demand for on-street parking and, if warranted, may deploy tools such as parking permits or other approaches to manage on-street parking. 

  • Share What areas of Whitehorse are included in this proposed change (a map)? on Facebook Share What areas of Whitehorse are included in this proposed change (a map)? on Twitter Share What areas of Whitehorse are included in this proposed change (a map)? on Linkedin Email What areas of Whitehorse are included in this proposed change (a map)? link

    What areas of Whitehorse are included in this proposed change (a map)?

    SVH asked about 2 months ago

    Thanks for your inquiry! A map has been added to the project page showing the affected zones. Here is a link to access it directly: https://www.engagewhitehorse.ca/40561/widgets/173867/documents/125554.

  • Share According to my Property Assessment notice and my Property Tax notice, our property is zoned as "RS1" at 88 Ponderosa Dr. On the "Summary of Proposed Changes" document, page 2 it does not list RS1. It does list RS however. On the maps and the web based platform these lots are listed as RS. My question is it RS or RS1? If RS1, is that excluded from this rewrite? on Facebook Share According to my Property Assessment notice and my Property Tax notice, our property is zoned as "RS1" at 88 Ponderosa Dr. On the "Summary of Proposed Changes" document, page 2 it does not list RS1. It does list RS however. On the maps and the web based platform these lots are listed as RS. My question is it RS or RS1? If RS1, is that excluded from this rewrite? on Twitter Share According to my Property Assessment notice and my Property Tax notice, our property is zoned as "RS1" at 88 Ponderosa Dr. On the "Summary of Proposed Changes" document, page 2 it does not list RS1. It does list RS however. On the maps and the web based platform these lots are listed as RS. My question is it RS or RS1? If RS1, is that excluded from this rewrite? on Linkedin Email According to my Property Assessment notice and my Property Tax notice, our property is zoned as "RS1" at 88 Ponderosa Dr. On the "Summary of Proposed Changes" document, page 2 it does not list RS1. It does list RS however. On the maps and the web based platform these lots are listed as RS. My question is it RS or RS1? If RS1, is that excluded from this rewrite? link

    According to my Property Assessment notice and my Property Tax notice, our property is zoned as "RS1" at 88 Ponderosa Dr. On the "Summary of Proposed Changes" document, page 2 it does not list RS1. It does list RS however. On the maps and the web based platform these lots are listed as RS. My question is it RS or RS1? If RS1, is that excluded from this rewrite?

    RS1 asked 2 months ago

    Great question! The proposed amendments are relating to the zones established by the City of Whitehorse Zoning Bylaw. You have correctly identified that your zoning is RS, which is among the zones that are included in the proposed amendments. 

     The RS1 ‘zone’ identified on your property assessment notice is relating to the class of use identified by the Property Assessment and Taxation branch of the Government of Yukon to determine the assessed value of your property for the purpose of taxation. The City, in turn, uses that class of use to determine the tax rate for your property (the tax rate varies depending on whether it is residential, non-residential, or agricultural), and that's why it appears on your property tax notice. However, it is not the same as the zoning established by the City through the Zoning Bylaw.    

  • Share *This question was originally received by the planning team via social media. Can one property have 2 water lines to the street? on Facebook Share *This question was originally received by the planning team via social media. Can one property have 2 water lines to the street? on Twitter Share *This question was originally received by the planning team via social media. Can one property have 2 water lines to the street? on Linkedin Email *This question was originally received by the planning team via social media. Can one property have 2 water lines to the street? link

    *This question was originally received by the planning team via social media. Can one property have 2 water lines to the street?

    City Resident asked 2 months ago

    No. The Water Utility Bylaw requires that each lot have no more than one complete water service, unless permitted by the Designated Officer.

  • Share *This question was originally received by the planning team via email. In regards to the amendment allowing 4 residential units per lot, have you considered the implications of all the extra wells and septic fields that will have to be built in an area such as Mary Lake that has issues already with our watershed? on Facebook Share *This question was originally received by the planning team via email. In regards to the amendment allowing 4 residential units per lot, have you considered the implications of all the extra wells and septic fields that will have to be built in an area such as Mary Lake that has issues already with our watershed? on Twitter Share *This question was originally received by the planning team via email. In regards to the amendment allowing 4 residential units per lot, have you considered the implications of all the extra wells and septic fields that will have to be built in an area such as Mary Lake that has issues already with our watershed? on Linkedin Email *This question was originally received by the planning team via email. In regards to the amendment allowing 4 residential units per lot, have you considered the implications of all the extra wells and septic fields that will have to be built in an area such as Mary Lake that has issues already with our watershed? link

    *This question was originally received by the planning team via email. In regards to the amendment allowing 4 residential units per lot, have you considered the implications of all the extra wells and septic fields that will have to be built in an area such as Mary Lake that has issues already with our watershed?

    City Resident asked 2 months ago

    The proposed amendments would only apply to zones in urban residential areas, where the lots are connected to municipal water and sewer. There are no changes proposed to country residential zones such as in Mary Lake.

Page last updated: 25 Apr 2024, 03:37 PM